Skip to Content
Last modified by Alex Cotiuga on 2026/07/13 06:43
From version 9.1
edited by Alex Cotiuga
on 2026/05/26 10:39
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 10.2
edited by Alex Cotiuga
on 2026/07/03 15:53
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Parent
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +resources.WebHome
Default language
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -en
Hidden
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -false
1 +true
Content
... ... @@ -124,6 +124,15 @@
124 124   should be part of the validation plan.
125 125   </p>
126 126  
127 + <div class="resource-inline-cta">
128 + <p>
129 + <strong>Not sure how risky your current XWiki version is?</strong>
130 + A short technical review can clarify the upgrade path, extension compatibility,
131 + custom code risks and validation needs before production is touched.
132 + </p>
133 + <a class="btn btn-secondary" href="$xwiki.getURL('contact.WebHome')">Request a quick review</a>
134 + </div>
135 +
127 127   <h2 id="upgrade-checklist">XWiki upgrade planning checklist</h2>
128 128  
129 129   <p>
... ... @@ -241,6 +241,19 @@
241 241   </div>
242 242   </section>
243 243  
253 + <section class="cta-section" aria-labelledby="why-upgrade-xwiki-cta-title">
254 + <div class="container">
255 + <div class="cta-panel">
256 + <h2 id="why-upgrade-xwiki-cta-title">Need help planning an XWiki upgrade?</h2>
257 + <p>
258 + If your XWiki instance is outdated, customized or business-critical, the safest next step is to review
259 + the current version, extensions, infrastructure and validation needs before planning the production upgrade.
260 + </p>
261 + <a class="btn btn-primary" href="$xwiki.getURL('contact.WebHome')">Request an upgrade review</a>
262 + </div>
263 + </div>
264 + </section>
265 +
244 244   <script type="application/ld+json">
245 245   {
246 246   "@context": "https://schema.org",