Changes for page How to Customize XWiki Without Creating Upgrade Problems

Last modified by Agnease on 2026/05/26 11:00

Manage
- Copy
Actions
- Export
- Print Preview
Viewers
- Source
- Siblings
- Content
- Comments
- Attachments
- History
- Information
- Likes

From 12.1 to 12.2 From 12.4 to 12.5

From version 12.2

edited by Agnease
on 2026/05/26 10:49

Change comment: There is no comment for this version

To version 12.4

edited by Agnease
on 2026/05/26 11:00

Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Raw
Rendered

Summary

Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

@@ -109,6 +109,15 @@
              <a href="$xwiki.getURL('resources.xwiki-security-review')">what an XWiki security review should actually include</a>
              for related checks around permissions, authentication, extensions, infrastructure and operational practices.
            </p>
++
++          <div class="resource-inline-cta">
++            <p>
++              <strong>Unsure how maintainable your XWiki customizations are?</strong>
++              A customization review can help identify hidden scripts, undocumented logic,
++              upgrade risks and features that should be documented, cleaned up or packaged properly.
++            </p>
++            <a class="btn btn-secondary" href="$xwiki.getURL('contact.WebHome')">Request a customization review</a>
++          </div>
            <h2 id="safe-model">A safer model for XWiki custom work</h2>
@@ -216,40 +216,50 @@
            <h2 id="custom-development-faq">XWiki custom development FAQ</h2>
--          <h3>Does custom development make XWiki harder to upgrade?</h3>
--          <p>
--            Not automatically. Custom development becomes harder to upgrade when it is undocumented, mixed with regular
--            content, applied directly in production or missing from the upgrade validation plan. Well-organized custom work
--            can remain maintainable across upgrades.
--          </p>
++          <details class="resource-faq-item" open>
++            <summary>Does custom development make XWiki harder to upgrade?</summary>
++            <p>
++              Not automatically. Custom development becomes harder to upgrade when it is undocumented, mixed with regular
++              content, applied directly in production or missing from the upgrade validation plan. Well-organized custom work
++              can remain maintainable across upgrades.
++            </p>
++          </details>
--          <h3>Where should XWiki custom code be stored?</h3>
--          <p>
--            Custom wiki pages, scripts, templates and configuration should usually be kept in dedicated technical spaces.
--            Code and important assets should also be tracked in a source control system, such as Git, so changes are not
--            stored only in the production wiki.
--          </p>
++          <details class="resource-faq-item">
++            <summary>Where should XWiki custom code be stored?</summary>
++            <p>
++              Custom wiki pages, scripts, templates and configuration should usually be kept in dedicated technical spaces.
++              Code and important assets should also be tracked in a source control system, such as Git, so changes are not
++              stored only in the production wiki.
++            </p>
++          </details>
--          <h3>When should an XWiki customization become an extension?</h3>
--          <p>
--            Packaging a customization as an extension is useful when the feature becomes complex, reusable, business-critical
--            or shared across multiple instances. Java components, event listeners, scheduled jobs and integrations often
--            benefit from an extension-based approach.
--          </p>
++          <details class="resource-faq-item">
++            <summary>When should an XWiki customization become an extension?</summary>
++            <p>
++              Packaging a customization as an extension is useful when the feature becomes complex, reusable, business-critical
++              or shared across multiple instances. Java components, event listeners, scheduled jobs and integrations often
++              benefit from an extension-based approach.
++            </p>
++          </details>
--          <h3>What should be tested after an XWiki upgrade?</h3>
--          <p>
--            Besides standard pages, the validation should include custom dashboards, templates, macros, workflows,
--            permissions, notifications, PDF exports, scheduled jobs, integrations and any custom applications used by the
--            organization.
--          </p>
++          <details class="resource-faq-item">
++            <summary>What should be tested after an XWiki upgrade?</summary>
++            <p>
++              Besides standard pages, the validation should include custom dashboards, templates, macros, workflows,
++              permissions, notifications, PDF exports, scheduled jobs, integrations and any custom applications used by the
++              organization.
++            </p>
++          </details>
--          <h3>Why should configuration be kept outside custom code?</h3>
--          <p>
--            Values such as group names, target spaces, external URLs, email recipients and workflow settings can change over
--            time. Keeping them in configuration pages or preference objects makes custom features easier to adapt without
--            changing the implementation.
--          </p>
++          <details class="resource-faq-item">
++            <summary>Why should configuration be kept outside custom code?</summary>
++            <p>
++              Values such as group names, target spaces, external URLs, email recipients and workflow settings can change over
++              time. Keeping them in configuration pages or preference objects makes custom features easier to adapt without
++              changing the implementation.
++            </p>
++          </details>
            <div class="resource-note">
              <p>